I'd been sent this video weeks ago, and meant to post it--better late than never. It's a video profile of her from Concordia and it's just wonderfully done, captures what makes her such a great teacher, a great colleague, and a good friend.
Friday, July 27, 2012
Montreal Prep!
I think I just finished cutting down my paper for the IASIL conference, so I don't become one of those annoying people who goes over her time... But in the process of that, I'm also packing and such, having texting conversations with Dawn Duncan, for last minute help (going both ways). I think we're pretty much ready!
I'd been sent this video weeks ago, and meant to post it--better late than never. It's a video profile of her from Concordia and it's just wonderfully done, captures what makes her such a great teacher, a great colleague, and a good friend.
I'd been sent this video weeks ago, and meant to post it--better late than never. It's a video profile of her from Concordia and it's just wonderfully done, captures what makes her such a great teacher, a great colleague, and a good friend.
Thursday, July 26, 2012
State of Mind: Hot Enough Fer Ya?
The sadness with which I have left the lake is immense, but I'm in my parents' new house in Minneapolis, putting the finishing touches on my Focus Portfolio, which I hopefully will submit this afternoon. The weather outside we have stopped describing as "hot" or "humid" and just reduced our adjectives to "gross." I mentioned to my father this morning that it's too bad that the crops can't just suck the humidity out of the air.
This last weekend was Muskie Days, the annual celebration in my hometown of Nevis, and it corresponded with the 100th anniversary of the Nevis School. Such great fun. I saw so many people I haven't seen in years, caught up with classmates, got to see their kids. And I got to hang out on Sunday with my high school history teacher, Larry Smith, and his wife Julie--their daughters are the same age as my sister K2 and me. I sometimes still have a hard time calling Mr. Smith by his first name. But we got to talk history and politics and as we did, I was reminded of how much difference good teachers make. The last of my English teachers retired this year, after 38 years. Another of my English teachers MC'd the opening ceremony. I reread my senior yearbook and saw that my science teacher wrote that he hoped he hadn't turned me off to science--and I wished I could have seen him this weekend, because I think he'd be as surprised as I am that most of the classes I'm teaching are science related in some way.
But Mr. Smith--Larry--told me a while back that he was curious about my Natural Disasters class and wanted to see some of my materials. I'm in the process right now--as I'm still trying to pry my eyelids open and focus my eyes--of sending them to him. But the reason for this post is that the universe seems to align when it's supposed to: last night on the Daily Show and last night on the Rachel Maddow show, two different segments on energy policy. I wish I could consider the Daily Show segment funny (though I will always love John Oliver), but it hits too close to home, too close to existing arguments about the value of land, resources, and commodities.
So, here's your food for thought for the day:
This last weekend was Muskie Days, the annual celebration in my hometown of Nevis, and it corresponded with the 100th anniversary of the Nevis School. Such great fun. I saw so many people I haven't seen in years, caught up with classmates, got to see their kids. And I got to hang out on Sunday with my high school history teacher, Larry Smith, and his wife Julie--their daughters are the same age as my sister K2 and me. I sometimes still have a hard time calling Mr. Smith by his first name. But we got to talk history and politics and as we did, I was reminded of how much difference good teachers make. The last of my English teachers retired this year, after 38 years. Another of my English teachers MC'd the opening ceremony. I reread my senior yearbook and saw that my science teacher wrote that he hoped he hadn't turned me off to science--and I wished I could have seen him this weekend, because I think he'd be as surprised as I am that most of the classes I'm teaching are science related in some way.
But Mr. Smith--Larry--told me a while back that he was curious about my Natural Disasters class and wanted to see some of my materials. I'm in the process right now--as I'm still trying to pry my eyelids open and focus my eyes--of sending them to him. But the reason for this post is that the universe seems to align when it's supposed to: last night on the Daily Show and last night on the Rachel Maddow show, two different segments on energy policy. I wish I could consider the Daily Show segment funny (though I will always love John Oliver), but it hits too close to home, too close to existing arguments about the value of land, resources, and commodities.
So, here's your food for thought for the day:
Thursday, July 19, 2012
A Discussion Starter: Derek Hand and Ken Bruen
Last night, while hiding out in my bedroom at the cabin,
which is the only room with AC in it, trying not to die of humidity poisoning,
I opened my iPad to Ken Bruen’s Sanctuary. I’d seen the title in a few of the
articles I’d been perusing for my Irish Noir syllabus that I’m in the midst of
creating, but I’d never read it.
To my delight and irritation, I finished it in one sitting. This morning, I’ve got my pot of Earl
Grey to ward off the grayness of the rainy morning, and Tana French’s Faithful Place is staring up at me from
the coffee table. Nope. I have to read Eoin Flannery’s book on
postcolonial Ireland and Mark Allister’s book on nature writing and autobiography.
The book is set in Galway, which may be one of the reasons I
wanted to read Bruen as much as I do, because as we all know, Galway is very
important to me. (Those who know
me will remember that my cat’s name is Galway…) So reading Bruen’s landmarks was as much fun for me as one
who knows those places as it was for the story. The plot surrounds PI Jack Taylor, who’s been sent a cryptic
note, a shopping list of victims.
The first has already been killed, a hit-and-run. Taylor slips off the wagon in this
novel (and I did enjoy the tour of various Galway pubs, incluing The Quays, which
he describes as a tourist haunt) and spends most of the book either drunk or on
some sort of drug (Xanax is a favorite).
The sad truth is that when I closed the back cover (metaphorically,
since I was reading it on my iPad), I was hugely disappointed. I felt like it should have been a first
draft, with an editor going back and marking through it with notes like
“Develop this further!” and “This is not earned.” Some major stuff happens to Jack in these pages, and yes,
it’s true, he’s on Xanax for most of it, but there are two major revelations
here—one that involves the murderer and one that involves a past trauma in his
own life—and Jack’s reactions were not believable to me.
But—and this is a huge but—yesterday I finished Derek Hand’s
book on the history of the Irish novel and this might be only the second time
I’ve finished a book of criticism with a smile (the first would be Mark
Tredinnick’s The Land’s Wild Music). Dang. Really, really good stuff. Hand’s style is very readable and the points that he makes
about how the novel developed in Ireland is right on, as far as I can
tell. (Remember, I’m a nonfiction
writer first…) I appreciated the
attention that Hand paid to the role of place and landscape, even though that
dimension was surprising to me. I
also appreciated that the book is new enough to cover some of the books that
are on my focus list. And for the
most part, I agreed with him for most of his book.
Except for the section where he addressed genre
fiction. In that section, I
strongly disagree. I haven’t
completely articulated my position yet, but this is a movement towards a
position—and I absolutely welcome any discussion any of my dear readers might
have. I have no problems with
people disagreeing with me either.
Hand’s admiration of John Banville—which I share—is evident
throughout those sections of his book and it makes me want to dive back into
those books (which I can’t, not right now, dang it). When he transitions into Benjamin Black, this is what Hand
has to say:
“For Banville himself, who in his fiction often employed the
figure of the double and the twin to manifest his sense of rupture, the
obligation to artistic selfhood and authorship was itself exploded when he
began to write in the thriller genre under the pseudonym Benjamin Black with Christine Falls (2006) and The Silver Swan (2007). While his decision to enter this
thriller marketplace could be argued to be a materialization of a crisis in
identity that is so central to his ever-doubling heroes, it has more to do, one
imagines, with a desire to connect with a lucrative wider readership” (263).
As a creative writer myself—and this is actually something
I’d love to ask Banville himself—I disagree that the choice to write in a
different genre is motivated by the desire for money. I’ve a novel that I’m working on, of the serious literary
variety, but I also would very much like to write a thriller set in Fargo
during a flood. Were I to finish
both of these novels, I would not feel like I’m selling out. I mentioned briefly in a previous post
that there are questions and ideas that literary fiction makes difficult to
discuss. Genre fiction—which has
long been eschewed by capital-L Literature—can and often is as well written as
any Literary fiction. One might point
to the historical romance author Eloisa James, who in addition to having a PhD
in English (and she teaches Shakespeare at Fordham University), she also comes from the
impressive literary lineage of Robert and Carol Bly (which makes me want to
claim her as a Minnesotan.) And
the contemporary chick lit author Jennifer Crusie (though I really hate that
term, chick lit) also has a PhD in
English. And if the point of genre
fiction is to address issues and questions in a format that Literary Fiction is
not willing to do—if it can do so at all—then it fills a niche that is
needed. But since the critical
study of crime literature is very thin, I can understand the position that Hand
is working through here.
Hand writes of “chick lit” that it “is concerned only with
the immediate moment in terms of theme and also in terms of reader response”
(275). And of thriller fiction,
“And the increasing proficiency in the thriller genre by Irish writers, for
instance, suggests a means for middlebrow authors…to connect with like-minded
middlebrow readers beyond Ireland” (281).
And later, “Whereas a previous generation of Irish novelists might have
aspired to self-expression through art, the situation is now altered and the
writerly self is subsumed into the conformities of plot and the necessities of
the literary marketplace that accentuates cold and calculating conformity. Even those widely celebrated novels and
novelists that apparently play with form and offer seemingly endless challenges
to traditional narratives become tiresomely jaded and orthodox rather rapidly”
(281).
I strenuously disagree, to the point of waving my hands to
punctuate the tone of my voice. If
our purpose in reading (and our purpose as writers in writing) is to understand
something of the world that we didn’t—and couldn’t—before, to add to our
understanding of the world’s complexity, then genre fiction is not lesser than
literary fiction. It simply fills
a different purpose. (I also
suspect that the censors and the publishing of literature in Ireland has something
to do with why genre fiction is late in coming to the game, but that’s a
supposition I can’t support with facts.)
Some of the thriller writers I like best write better sentences than
some of the Literary writers I read.
The highest compliment I can give a book is “S/He sure knows how to put
a sentence together!” And I
believe that the role of genre fiction—particularly crime literature—is to draw
society’s attention to issues that we would not have been able to talk about
any other way.
For instance.
In Bruen’s Sanctuary, things
come up that seem innocuous on the surface but could be excellent starting
points for discussions on current topics—inside and outside of a
classroom. (I don’t think I can
teach Sanctuary, but the point still works.) We could talk about drug use. We could talk about gays and gay rights in Ireland. We could talk about the obesity epidemic
that came with the Celtic Tiger (it’s just a tiny moment with Ben, but still an
important moment). We can talk
about corruption. On a writerly
level, we can talk about the role of Galway in the plot (and if I do end up
teaching Bruen, you can bet we will.
A lot.) We can talk about
how Bruen’s Jack Taylor fits into the pantheon of hard-boiled PI’s and the noir
genre, right down to the femme fatale. (That was a plot twist I didn’t see
coming, though it came way too early in the story for me.) I read Declan Hughes’s The City of Lost Girls—and we could talk
about violence against women and violence against women used for entertainment
value. Since I’m working on Joseph
O’Connor’s Star of the Sea, and that
can be considered a murder mystery, we can talk about the failure of systems,
class, race issues. Genres and
subgenres are not mutually exclusive.
And thank God for it.
It’s entirely possible that Hand and I are talking apples
and oranges here. He’s concerned
with the originality of plot and the form that takes in the history of the
Irish novel. By its very nature,
genre fiction is largely formulaic.
But that doesn’t mean crime literature doesn’t have its own history and
its own genealogy, the same sort of history that Hand is tracing in his
book. If you read any crime
fiction scholarship, it’s clear that there is a progression and a reason for
that progression. Each generation
of crime writers fits their work into the particular time and place and issues
it’s facing. Dashiell Hammett and
Raymond Chandler are fitting into a very specific time and place, working
against the corruption of the legal system and the moral corruption of the
city. And that’s just one
example. I could go on. And on.
Is the explosion of crime literature in Ireland a symptom of
literature being devalued? I don’t
think so. But then, a lot of the
crime literature I’m reading is extremely well written, extremely well plotted. The innovations that crime literature
brings to the table may not be in terms of plot, but of content and the way
that they offer up for public consumption a more realistic view of what is
happening in the contemporary world.
Thursday, July 12, 2012
Eng. 180 and Beyond: For the Love of Irish Noir
I’m finding my academic ADD to be particularly irritating
right now. I’m three weeks out
from my deadline to finish my Focus portfolio for my comps (the one on
contemporary Irish prose) and for the most part, I’m on track to do that. Of course, that does not preclude the
stress dreams of late (I’m mostly prone to the ones where the brakes in the car
fail or my teeth fall out). But
then I get up in the morning, make my tea, sit down in the brown chair in my grandparents’
living room, listen to the wind in the leaves, the loons on the lake, try to
ignore the irritating buzz of boat motors and jet skiis, drink my tea, and
remember that my life is pretty dang good.
My ADD right now has to do with this corollary thing I’ve
picked up in the last few months (mostly because the book I’m writing my paper
on, what I’ll present to the IASIL conference in three weeks, is on Joseph
O’Connor’s Star of the Sea, billed as a murder-mystery)—Irish crime
literature. Naturally, I see this
as a gorgeous hybrid of the crime literature class I’m teaching in the fall and
my focus list. Contemporary Irish
crime literature? Yes,
please. I’m reading Raymond
Chandler and Dashiell Hammett in my spare time (yes, that’s sarcastic) to get
ready for the class, as well as anything else I can get my hands on to build up
a better base for what I’m going to teach. But I keep getting side tracked into Irish noir. I don’t have time to be side tracked,
but I can’t stop, so I’m trying to make a productive something out of it, so I
can justify the time I’m spending on it.
This is not a small genre either, as I’m learning—enough
going on there that I’m going to work up a syllabus on the subject, partly for
the fun of it and partly to build up my folder of ready-to-go classes to teach. I’ve got a creative writing class
worked up (which I taught Spring 2012) and I will work up an introductory Irish
lit class for my Focus Portfolio requirements—but I also want to work up an
advanced Irish lit class. The
dream class, as it were. Just as I
think that teaching crime literature—both classic and popular—provokes us to
conversations that we might not have otherwise, narrowing that idea to a
specific place is right up my place-conscious alley, so to speak.
But when I came across Andrew Kincaid’s article “‘Down These
Mean Streets’: The City and Critique in Contemporary Irish Noir,” a couple of
puzzle pieces I hadn’t known I was missing fit into place. Kincaid wrote of the eminent Declan
Kiberd’s questioning (in 2005) where the literature that reflected the economic
boom of the Celtic Tiger—and Kincaid argues that the literature has been
written, but not in a form that Kiberd recognized: crime literature.
Crime literature, especially of the noir/hard-boiled variety (pioneered,
of course, by Dashiell Hammett and Raymond Chandler, among others) is the genre
that reflects the “violence, ugliness, the distrust, the moral conflicts, and
tempo that are inherent in the moment” (41). Later, Kincaid writes that “In noir the city is not a mere
physical backdrop in which the plot can unfold; the city itself functions as a
central character, frequently determining the emotions of the hero as much as
in any naturalist narrative” (41).
This is true. And something
I’ve based a lot of my teachings on, no matter what kind of text we’re looking
at and no matter what type of class I’m teaching (composition, creative
writing, or literature). Looking
at any type of writing through the lens of place studies then opens up the opportunity
for students to question how place functions in their lives, what kind of role
it plays. Of course, this type of
looking-outward is the goal of any class.
I’ve written here before of my deep and abiding adoration
for John Banville and his crime-writing alter ego, Benjamin Black. I found Elegy for April in a thrift store recently, which was rather
exciting, and was a welcome return to the world of Quirke (since I was
disappointed by The Silver Swan, though I might have to reread it to be sure I
disliked it as much as I remember).
And also the amazingness of Tana French’s In the Woods. I
haven’t gotten a chance to read more of her work, but I can’t wait till I
do. I picked up Declan Hughes at
the library yesterday (surprised that the little library had any of the names
on my list), but I’m only a few pages in, so I have no opinion yet. I did lend Christine Falls and In the
Woods to a lady I’m cleaning cabins with this summer—and she was nearly
speechless with adoration for Christine
Falls when I saw her the next week.
She said she’s halfway through In the Woods and will be hard-pressed to
say which one she likes better.
(This, given my Chocolat
savant dreams, made me exceptionally happy.)
What teaching—or taking—a class in such a narrow area offers
is beyond the benefits I’ve mentioned, because one place is not like another
place. Crime fiction set in Los
Angeles is not the same as that set in Boston or northern Minnesota or
Dublin. Each place has its own
character, its own particular set of cultures and problems. It’s like I wrote when I posted on
Benjamin Black’s Silver Swan—I know
that 1950s Dublin is a very specific place with its own very specific issues
and cultural expectations and gender roles. (Which is why I loved Christine
Falls more than Silver Swan,
because those pieces played a role in the plot.) And being able to teach these things on a literature level
(or a creative writing level) means giving them the tools to be aware of
everything they take for granted when they read a book “for fun.”
A friend did her project in our Women’s Rhetoric class this
last semester on sex trafficking in popular fiction and in her presentation,
she talked about who the protagonists were, what they tended to do for a
living, how the law was involved (cops, lawyers, or journalists, generally made
up the bulk of careers)—but the thing that stuck with me was how she said even
if a woman was the protagonist, trying to stop this trafficking, she
more-than-frequently fell into the hands of the bad guys herself and needed the
male protagonist to save her. So
even though we had a strong female in the lead of the story, she still needed
to be saved by a man. And now I’m
on the lookout for whenever I see that happening in any story I read—and
awareness is the largest challenge of academia, that moment where my student
says, “I never thought about it that way before” the sweetest. If our students don’t recognize that
something is happening, we can’t have any sort of a discussion about it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)